Update - Targets for Week 4 of the NFL season are:
6728/1459
3598/7126
1846/9752
5739/1684
8472/9506
4769/1380
2517/6948
Thanks to those from Substack who viewed with us last week! If you haven’t, please join us!
Welcome back … another exciting week of football and psi. While we were only 3 for 7 this week, we’re still about 56% on the year thus far, and I feel we’re really hitting our groove viewing collectively. Tons of similar target hits amongst our members, check this out:
These drawings were enough to easily choose the Colts over the Ravens, which ended up panning out in overtime. Despite using their backup QB who I believe had gone 1 for 11 in his last 12 starts in the NFL, RV settled on the Indianapolis. We all basically viewed some kind of animal, and the dinosaur drawing is by far the most on point — great job everyone. Stunning to see how we can all “see” the same thing, based on nothing more than a random series of digits associated with a photo.
OK, this is really pumping on all cylinders here. Notice the similarities between the patterns drawn between viewers themselves, all reflecting the cat-tunnel and toys. While none of us seemed to tune in to the cat itself, we all knew something was happening with the patterns in the tunnel. I love the “swiss cheese” note perfectly picking up on the white spots on red.
Just in case it wasn’t clear, we’re all viewing these targets independently and completely blind. The only piece of information we’re given is the 8-digit code. Our judge (my better half) determines which photo is most accurately represented by the drawings.
Oh, and to make this even more trippy, I give the target numbers out before the photos are even chosen. In other words, the viewers often turn in their drawings before our judge 1) ever sees the drawings and 2) chooses the photos. Time and space don’t seem to matter much with remote viewing, as is often stressed by the OGs, and in fact, our style of operating might in fact aid in our accuracy. I have a spreadsheet of every NFL 2023 regular season game, already associated with a randomly chose 8-digit code, no repeats. I then highlight the games/target numbers that we find interesting that week, and set up the session. We simply store every photo association on an iPad photo editing app, judge them, and make predictions. In this case, the Eagles cruised to a Monday night victory.
We failed to predict the Miami Dolphins route of the Broncos. In this case, it was a 50/50 toss up — two viewings for one photo, two viewings slightly stronger match for the other photo. Perhaps we should have “passed”, which in this case would have improved our accuracy.
While none of these viewings were extremely accurate or spot on, they were enough to clearly pick the Steelers to beat the Raiders in Vegas (sigh), and that they did! My viewing is the “perspective” one — I tend to be good at determining photos that are taken at weird angles or in funny positions. Everyone has unique RV strengths and weaknesses — colors, sounds, textures, people/water/animals present, and so on. I love the viewing picking up on wooden structure in the upper left.
Why aren’t you guys more accurate?
Because that would mean our small RV group would be masters of the fate of the National Football League. One of the best associative remote viewer has a hit rate of about 58% over thousands and thousands of trials, which according to statistics, is impossible to attain by “chance” — or more accurately, it could be chance, at trillions to one odds! For those doing the math, yes, it does appear to be enough to print money in the sportsbooks, too.
I’m personally tweaking our approach all the time to attain that 55-60% window by the end of the season. We started out hot, so it’s natural to have some variance and have an off-week here and there. However, some RV groups, especially shorter term ones, go on huge hot streaks and absolutely crush it. Most settle down over enough time and show the standard psi deviation above chance, however.
Even if ARV =/= RV in terms of predicting the future, I still find it mind-blowing that we’re all able to tune in to the same targets week after week. That alone defies what should be considered possible under the standard materialist “brain creates all human consciousness” model — though if you’re subscribed to this ‘stack and listen to Rare Candy, I doubt you believe such foolishness :)
Best,
-Psi