Remote Viewing the NFL 2023 - Week 12
by Crypto Psi
Been a while! Rest assured, we’ve been remote viewing the NFL week in, week out. If you’re new to this series, remote viewing is a protocol using non-local consciousness to gather information on a “target”, usually a photo inside an envelope for practice sessions. Associative remote viewing is used to determine binary outcomes (NFL games) by assigning two photos to two opponent teams, viewing the photo associated with the winning team in the future, and determining if there is confident enough of a match to make a prediction.
Keep in mind that RV is done 100% blind. None of our viewers know what games they are viewing in particular, and couldn’t pick a “favorite” team even if they wanted to. Any positive effect of ARV on picking NFL games would be purely do to humans using psi to predict the future.
Here are some of our best sessions from the past few weeks:
This session was spot on, and created a prediction for the Jaguars to beat the Titans in week 11. They were indeed victorious, winning with a score of 34-14. Out of all the endless possibilities for a subject photo, imagine the odds of sketching “creature in a field” and having it correctly predict an NFL game — truly a needle in a haystack, unless of course, psi is real.
Jessie (JHolmie89) from our Adjustment Team/Paycheck PKD premium episode has been RVing with us all year, and has proven to be one of our most talented viewers. Here, she clearly nails the “face” gestalt (kinda mean, sharp features) and even vibes the “black hair” of the artist on the ladder. This was clearly enough info to pick Cincinnati to beat Buffalo in week 9 — or was it San Fran in week 8? We’ve picked multiple Bengals victories this year. JHolmie is a newbie viewer, proving that anyone can start getting hits right away.
Another Ravens victory predicted, this time over the Bengals! I just checked and we’re actually 4/4 in predicting Baltimore wins. This one speaks for itself as well. I love when a RV session isn’t spot on in descriptiveness, but is spot on in gestalt (an important RV concept apparently). I don’t know how this stuff works, I just know that it does work.
Here’s an example of just one phrase being enough to pick a team — in this case, the phrase “sand dunes”, clearly visible in the photo associated with the Eagles. Uhhh, disregard “torture” and “duck bill” I guess!
Another gestalt pick. “Circle”, “far apart but connected”. One thing RV trains you to do is differentiate between people and non-people photos, animals, photos with life, void of life, etc. This photo was associated with a Rams victory over the Cardinals.
The overall shape and color were enough to pick the Bears to win over the Panthers on Thursday Night Football. While clearly Kelby had a vision of a red car, it was close enough — all you need to win a prediction. Kelby is a gifted author, as most of you know by now. My RV mentor says that artists and authors are naturally good remote viewers. Makes perfect sense.
Results
We’ve viewed a total of 83 NFL games this season — 7 a week, but only 6 during the first week of the season.
We’re currently sitting at a 57% hit rate. This might not sound impressive, but is actually in line with some of the best sports bettors in the world, and certainly enough to be profitable if you were to wager on these RV picks. If we were to maintain this win percentage over a few more seasons, ARV (and more broadly, human psi abilities) would essentially be proven, statistically. Currently, these results still could be a chance anomaly, but every week this percentage holds, so does our confidence that these results aren’t chance.
Of course, personally I’m well aware of other remote viewing groups getting even better win percentages over even greater trials, for the open-minded skeptic, RV is all but proven to have an edge on par with the best sports gamblers of all time. It’s just nice to show ourselves what’s possible. I don’t even feel like we’re being particularly rigorous or professional, either. There’s always room for improvement.
But it gets crazier. Digging into the statistics of our wins/losses a bit deeper, we may have found an even greater edge. Currently, we’ve been picking games every week by including every primetime game by default (Thursday night, Sunday night, and Monday night games), and adding a few more discretionary picks to make a slate of 7 games. This means that we’ve paid no attention to spreads or odds. We only view the “moneyline”, aka who will be the ultimate winner at the end of the game.
If we filter our picks to only include close spreads, i.e. the favorite is favored -200 or lower, or the spread is 3.5 points or less in either direction, our win percentage jumps to almost 75%. I’ve heard of other remote viewing groups only choose close spread games, perhaps this is why! Our percentage for picking against “big” favorites appears actually worse than the general public average. Perhaps picking our games with spread in mind can actually boost our hit rate much further.
Either way, even if ARV for picking sports outcomes turns out to be a total bust (and it’s looking like it won’t), the revelation that humans can accurately recreate elements of a photo they’ve never seen before is paradigm-changing. I highly recommend getting into remote viewing, if only for the fun of it.
-Psi